“Buck Rogers” planes (part 2)

The smooth and sleek lines of the Millers Falls No.709 – a product of the streamline moderne era of the 1950s.

mf709_1

Fig 1: Millers Falls No.709

Millers Falls described the 709 and 714 as “The Finest Planes in the World”. The brochure that Millers Falls distributed outlined eight major characteristics.

mf_buckrogers2_s

Fig 2: Back of the advertising sheet for No.709 and 714.

The core components of the plane body are discussed below (leaving out the iron and finish):

1. BED – Cast iron, with substantial weight forward of the throat, and 25% more strength in the throat region. “freer chip and shaving clearance”.

mf709_bedtoe

Fig 3: The toe of the No.709

The bed of the plane is made of cast iron, with the 709 weighing in at 3 7/8 lbs. Unlike similar planes, like the Stanley #4, there is substantial weight forward of the throat. The overall weight is marginally more than an equivalent Stanley #4, but the weight is likely distributed differently, with less weight in the knob and tote (plastic), and the frog (aluminum), than the hardwood and cast iron used in the Stanley. The toe of the plane bed below the knob (Fig.3a) is hollow, with the circular depressions on either side of the plane (Fig.3c) being the ends of a rod which holds the thread for the screw which secures the knob to the plane (Fig.3b).

2. FROG – Aluminum hollow die casting, providing a stronger, more rigid support for the handle, and encasing both blade adjusting mechanisms. The bedding is 3-4 times longer than any other plane and is anchored by three screws giving increased strength and rigidity.

mf709_frog

Fig 4: The frog of the No.709

The frog is complex, enclosing both the lateral, and blade length adjustment, and the rear handle assembly. This does provide for a very rigid structure, however to adjust the frog requires removing the Tenite handle (not that the frog should need to be adjusted that often).

4. LEVER CAPRoller clamping mechanism in combination with three-point bearing locks the iron to the frog to “entirely eliminate” vibration or chatter. “Clamping and unclamping is almost effortless”.

The lever cap is the unique Millers Falls double-jointed, 3-point design (Patent No.1,822,520). The point of this is to provide a clamping action which not only clamps the lower and upper ends, but also in the middle so it is clamped throughout its length – eliminating any bowing and chattering action during operation.

mf709_levercapT

Fig 5: The double-jointed lever cap

5. DEPTH ADJUSTMENTFinger-tip control secured through much larger knurled adjustment knob, and “powerful” linkage.

mf709_depthADJ

Fig 6: The depth adjustment mechanism and thumbscrew

The depth adjustment knob is extremely large, and ergonomically designed (Fig.6b). The knob moves a screw which pivots the adjustment mechanism inside the frog (Fig.6a), moving the blade up and down.

6. LATERAL ADJUSTMENT“New accessibility and with ore comfortable and greater ease of operation”.

mf709_latADJ

Fig 7: The lateral adjustment lever

The lateral adjustment mechanism is a simple pivoting lever which adjusts the blade from side to side (Fig.7).

7. HANDLES“Guaranteed unbreakable in use”, the handles are made of Tennessee Eastman Tenite #2. It provides a “pleasant touch” and “surer, more comfortable grip”. The inside of the bed and frog are finished in gray, baked-on enamel. The lever, cap, and knurled adjusting nut are polished, nickel-plated.

mf709_handle

Fig 8: Holding the rear handle or tote

The handles and knobs of the planes were made of Tennessee Eastman Tenite #2, a cellulose acetate butyrate molding composition. This hard, “unbreakable” plastic was used by Millers Falls in many of its “Buck Rogers” era tools. Aesthetically, the shine of the metallic surfaces, the streamlining, and the red handles gave the planes a unique feel. The red handle is comfortable, although there is limited space between the handle and the frog, as shown in Fig.8a because the lateral adjustment lever almost touches the handle. Fig. 8b shows an alternative way of holding the plane.

The No.714 is similarly constructed. How functional are these planes? Stay tuned, I’ll do some testing sometime in the future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s